6.3.99 |
I don't think I mentioned that I went to the Symphony Thursday night. The experience is fading quickly, but fortunately, I wrote about it to a friend immediately afterward:I went to the symphony tonight. A violinist featured. I could not keep my eyes from her; everything about her was perfect. Pale green velvet tunic and pants draped around her body. You know how velvet is: sometimes dark and course or shiny and smooth, depending on the light. So it was with her: the velvet like arms roving, trying to hold all of her at once as she twisted in the wringing of the music. Her face, gnarled too, in ecstasy but agony. (The body does not know positive from negative, the conduits of passion are the same for both. So then, where in us is that distinction made? How do we know when to call it one or the other? Sometimes the disconcerting coexistence of both.) I thought that she was herself a string on the violin, silent except in movement. The music -- this exquisite piece by someone named Bruch -- resides somewhere, playing eternally. She was the portal whence it came. Poured. So passive was she to its whims, the distortion from its realm to this was nil. I felt shivers begin at my jaw and spread slowly over my shoulders to my belly at certain sustained notes held impossibly thin. This process of translation must have hurt her, did possess her. But she was at ease with it, too, accustomed to living with this gift, this demon. The violinist was Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg. A friend of Joan's could not use her tickets, and so she offered them to her. It was a great spur of the moment dressing up and going out. My first opportunity to see the inside of the new Benaroya Hall, too. I was not as impressed as I thought I would be with theater itself (though I liked the lobby well enough). I have been hearing such wonderful interpretations of the architecture and décor for many months. I thought that while the lines were simple, the details subtly elegant, they were also bland. I don't have the vocabulary to describe the structure, to make it clear what it is I see that I like or dislike. What I felt when I was there is this return to imposing blocky structures prevalent in the late 60's and 70's. Bureaucratic. Except, in place of the scheme of primary colors so often employed in those days, the hall is entirely colored in various shades of light brown and ivory. I've been hearing how beautiful the woodwork is -- hearing names of magnificent and expensive wood. I tried to examine it, but decided there was not enough of it, its lines too simple and subdued, to have an impact my senses. |
future past index |